Tag: performance management

understanding the difference between recognition and reward

UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RECOGNIZING AND REWARDING YOUR PEOPLE

Written by Kai Donesa on . Posted in Resources.

When was the last time you acknowledged your people for a job well done?

It’s easy to get caught up in the daily grind and forget to recognize the efforts of those around us. As leaders and managers, it’s crucial to understand the difference between recognizing and rewarding the hard work of our staff.

While recognition and reward are essential in motivating and encouraging employees, they are vastly different. Each word carries varying connotations and outcomes. Recognition is about acknowledging staff for improving at their jobs, while reward is about commending individual staff for their exceptional performance and achievements.

Knowing the difference between both strategies can transform your workplace dynamics. In this blog post, we will explore the nuances between recognizing and rewarding staff and how you can strike a balance to create a culture of appreciation and excellence in your organization.

Why you must distinguish between reward and recognition

Recognizing and rewarding staff are two distinct concepts often misunderstood and used interchangeably. Distinguishing between the two is critical because it informs how your organization appreciates and incentivizes its people. At the same time, recognition and reward complement each other in creating a balanced and positive workplace culture.

A common mistake in organizations is using recognition and reward synonymously. However, this mindset can lead to a skewed view of what motivates staff. Recognition and reward have different impacts, and implementing a balanced approach can significantly improve your human resources strategies.

Understanding recognition

At work, recognition can be a powerful motivator. Recognizing the growth in your people’s skills and knowledge boosts their morale and promotes a positive work culture. It’s an often-overlooked gesture that can significantly affect job satisfaction. When staff members feel valued and appreciated, they are more likely to put in their best effort.

The role of employee recognition in fostering a motivated, satisfied, and high-performing workforce cannot be overstated. As we better understand what recognition focuses on, remember that each point holds unique value in shaping an employee’s job progression.

Valuing knowledge. The knowledge and expertise of your people are the driving forces behind your organization’s innovation, problem-solving, and decision-making. Recognizing and appreciating the depth and breadth of your staff’s knowledge can foster a culture of learning and growth. It encourages employees to continue expanding their knowledge base, contributing to their personal and professional development.

Appreciating skills growth. Skills are the practical application of knowledge. They are tools that enable staff to work effectively. Recognizing the skills of your people, from technical prowess to interpersonal abilities, is important. By acknowledging the growth in your staff’s skill sets, you confirm their value to the organization.

Recognizing capacity. Capacity refers to a person’s ability to meet the demands of the job. Recognizing an employee’s capacity is acknowledging their potential and ability to take on challenges. You trust their abilities and are confident in their growth potential. This recognition can empower staff to push them beyond their limits and strive for achievement.

Focusing on professional development. Professional development is important in an employee’s career progression. Recognizing your staff’s commitment to continuous learning and improvement shows you value their drive to better themselves.

Managing fair and objective pay increases. When your staff feel that their hard work and dedication are recognized with appropriate compensation, it boosts their morale. Additionally, fair pay increases demonstrate that your organization values and appreciates their contributions, encouraging staff to continue improving their skills and knowledge.

Recognizing and appreciating employees’ efforts creates a positive work environment where everyone feels valued. The Birches Group approach to recognizing employees is rooted in skills growth. Managers and staff members collaborate and have equal ownership of measuring and growing their skills. Providing your people with a framework that objectively measures and recognizes their skills growth, you enable the following opportunities:

  • Your managers and staff provide input on the pace of their growth
  • Your people are recognized and compensated as they become better at their jobs.

Understanding reward

Reward is integral to an organization’s approach to managing people. Most organizations tend to link reward to high-achieving, outstanding employees. However, at Birches Group, we also reward a majority of the staff who meet the expectations of their jobs.

So, what differentiates reward from recognition?

Recognizing results. Reward is often tied to specific outcomes or achievements, such as exceeding targets or completing a project successfully. It is a way to acknowledge and celebrate the results that staff members have delivered. Recognizing staff accomplishments reinforces the importance of their contributions and motivates them to perform at their best.

Acknowledging impact. Whether it’s through ideas, client service, or an ability to solve complex problems, the impact of one’s work is felt throughout the organization. Rewarding this impact is a powerful way to show staff that their job matters and makes a difference. By focusing on output, your organization can encourage employees to think creatively. More importantly, focusing on getting things done gives your staff the flexibility to try different paths to achieving their output.

Highlighting critical incidents. Critical incidents are situations that require immediate attention and exceptional handling. When your staff successfully navigates these challenging situations, it’s important to recognize their quick thinking and problem-solving skills. This will boost their confidence and motivate them to manage future incidents with the same level of competence.

Celebrating achievements. Achievements deserve credit and kudos. By celebrating your staff’s achievements, you acknowledge their efforts and foster a sense of pride in their work. When you take time to celebrate individual or team accomplishments, it also encourages a spirit of camaraderie and communal success.

Offering bonuses. Bonuses are a tangible way of rewarding exceptional performance. They show your employees that you notice and appreciate their hard work. Offering bonuses as a form of recognition can incentivize employees to continue performing at a high level.

recognizing the difference of recognition and reward

Why your organization should both recognize and reward staff

A successful organization is like a well-oiled machine, with each part playing a role in supporting smooth operations. Employees are the most vital, powering the machine with their skills, dedication, and creativity. Thus, organizations must not only recognize but also reward staff.

As discussed earlier, recognition is a powerful tool that can significantly increase staff morale. When employees feel their hard work and dedication are recognized, they feel valued in the organization. This, in turn, can boost their productivity and enthusiasm for their work. Moreover, recognition fosters a positive work culture where employees feel appreciated and are likelier to go the extra mile for their job.

While recognition fuels pride in one’s work, reward reinforces this sentiment. Whether monetary or otherwise, rewards are a tangible acknowledgment of an employee’s contributions. They function as a driving force, motivating staff to exceed their performance levels and strive for higher achievements.

How to balance recognition and rewards in your workplace

Recognition and rewards help foster a positive work environment. They reinforce the behaviors and values that contribute to an organization’s success. However, striking the right balance between the two is a delicate process. If not appropriately managed, it can lead to discontent and demotivation among staff.

An overemphasis on rewards may make recognition seem hollow, while focusing too much on recognition may leave staff members feeling undervalued due to the lack of tangible benefits. Your organization can achieve an optimal balance by maintaining a consistent pattern of recognition and tying rewards to clearly defined performance benchmarks.

Recognize effort and reward results. Recognition should be frequent and consistent, aimed at acknowledging effort. This approach motivates all team members and not just top performers. Employees who see their efforts recognized will likely continue contributing to their best abilities. On the other hand, rewards should be linked to significant achievements and results. This approach reinforces the link between performance and rewards, encouraging employees to strive for excellence.

Implement a fair and transparent system. Fairness is vital in balancing recognition and rewards. Ensure that all employees understand how the recognition and reward system works and that it is applied consistently and uniformly across teams. Make sure the rules and criteria for recognition and reward are well-defined and communicated to each staff member. This involves outlining the performance standards or behaviors that will be rewarded or recognized, and the types of rewards or recognition that employees can earn.

How Birches Group’s approach and tools can help

At Birches Group, we understand the importance of recognition and rewards in engaging your staff. Our Community™ approach has made it possible to distinguish recognition from reward, where pay movement is linked to skills growth, and performance is linked to rewarding achievement.

Our online platform offers comprehensive tools and resources to help your organization recognize and reward employees effectively. In addition, our compensation and benefits surveys provide data and insights into what similar organizations in your labor market are doing to recognize and reward staff.

We also offer training and consulting services to help you develop and implement effective recognition and rewards programs. Our team of experts is ready to guide your organization using Community™. Contact Birches Group today and let us guide you in distinguishing recognition and reward.

Carla is a part-time copywriter in our marketing team in Manila. Before shifting to freelance writing in 2020, she worked as a marketing and communications specialist at the offices of EY and Grant Thornton. She has written about HR and career development for Kalibrr. 

Follow us on our LinkedIn for more content on pay management and HR solutions.

Performance Rating

WHY A FIVE-POINT PERFMORMANCE RATING SYSTEM MAY BE DETRIMENTAL TO PEOPLE MANAGEMENT

Written by Kai Donesa on . Posted in Resources.

You probably finished 2022 with a performance evaluation round with a five-point performance rating system. To evaluate yourself, your supervisor, and your colleagues, you were probably given a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest rating.

I’ve worked with several employers, including at large firms and a nonprofit organization, and I’ve noticed that they follow the same approach to evaluating staff performance. To assess yourself, your supervisor, and your colleagues, you’re given a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest rating.

Most organizations use the traditional five-point performance rating system. But a five-point system carries with it a range of people management issues. Instead of motivating staff, it does the complete opposite. And the root cause is that employees want to receive a perfect rating of 5 out of 5. Anything less than that, even a 4, would be undesirable and be seen as a failure.

I’ve experienced this dilemma firsthand. When my work performance was rated a 4, I was disappointed. I couldn’t help but compare myself to my coworkers, who received higher ratings closer to a perfect 5. Looking back, this traditional five-point system for measuring performance is far from helpful for several reasons.

In this article, we’ll explore why a five-point performance rating system may be detrimental not just to people managers and human resources but to the organization. We’ll also share what your human resources department can do to address this all-too-common mistake.

Does striving for excellence work?

To achieve success and become a market leader, organizations ‘aim high’ in setting employee expectations and performance standards. The strategy: celebrate the few exemplary and high-performing staff members who will inspire others to do the same. Additionally, employees are encouraged to do exceptionally well at their job every time.

The consequences of such an approach are potentially disastrous, however.

What are the drawbacks of aiming for a perfect rating?

Many organizations believe that setting ‘exceed’ or 5 out of 5 as the gold standard for performance is the best way to meet their goals. But this can lead to undesired behaviors, as seen in the situations below.

Divide and conquer. Setting extraordinarily high expectations can lead to false confidence and optimism. If staff work hard to exceed expectations, there is a greater chance of being adamantly focused on their own goals than collective goals. This can lead to division and conflict as staff members try to reach lofty individual goals.

Expectations versus reality. Setting ‘exceed’ as the performance standard can also create unrealistic expectations. When staff members believe they can achieve incredible things, they may be disappointed when reality doesn’t meet their expectations. As a result, they become too critical of their work, always striving to improve, even when the work is satisfactory. Employees may feel they can’t succeed, leading to demoralization and frustration and harming team morale and productivity.

Under pressure. Doing one’s job well can sometimes be challenging, but it is even more problematic when it involves working under conditions that aren’t conducive to success. When the pressure is high, it is easy for performance to suffer.

Compare and contrast. Instead of working on their tasks and achieving their goals, employees may be more likely to focus on how they compare to others. And when comparing their work with that of their colleagues, staff may feel they need to do more. This can lead to resentment and conflict, and it can also damage morale.

Alienation. When managers reward only high-performing staff members, they may inadvertently harm employee engagement. Managers who target star employees may risk alienating others who feel they cannot meet expectations. This hurts employee engagement and affects the organization’s culture and vibe.

At a certain point, striving to excel and exceed expectations may become frustrating or demotivating. To avoid setting up your organization for failure and to keep staff accountable, consider shifting to a performance standard that is more realistic and meaningful to them.

What does Birches Group recommend?

Remember that people want to feel valued and that everyone in the organization matters. Setting the attainable goal of achieving targets and improving one’s skills and performance are better ways to motivate people.

In contrast to the traditional five-point performance rating system I’ve seen in several organizations, Birches Group uses a simpler, less problematic four-point system. At Birches Group, performance is measured on a four-point system—Fail, Needs Improvement, Achieve, and Exceed—where Achieve is the gold standard and Exceed is the highest and reflects exceptional work. What I appreciate about this more straightforward approach is that there is less pressure, politics, and alienation. Everyday achievers are held in high esteem. Most staff are achievers who deliver what is expected of them in a performance year. Through the Birches Group four-point rating system, the organization can celebrate the many ‘good’ or the many achievers while allowing the exceptional few to be rewarded accordingly. The fact that there are different kinds of performers—the good, the great, and the exceptional—is acknowledged.

Bottom line

Recognize only a few exemplary employees, and you could set up your organization for failure. If you want staff to remain productive, engaged, and empowered, celebrate the many achievers across your organization and aim for progress. Doing so will also help your people stay focused, deliver results, and ultimately help them feel that they matter.

Contact us to learn more about Birches Group’s Community™ Performance and schedule your demo today.

Carla is a part-time copywriter in our marketing team in Manila. Before shifting to freelance writing in 2020, she worked as a marketing and communications specialist at the offices of EY and Grant Thornton. She has written about HR and career development for Kalibrr. 

Follow us on our LinkedIn for more content on pay management and HR solutions.

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IS BROKEN. FIX OR GIVE UP?

Written by Kai Donesa on . Posted in Resources.

Performance management is the Achilles Heel of HR.  It remains a contentious process that many companies have now abandoned, or at least are thinking of abandoning. A tool initially intended to communicate management objectives and keep the work of staff aligned throughout the year has now evolved into a dreaded exercise that just further leads to a disengaged workforce. With its rigid design and lack of adaptability, the traditional performance management approach has left many questioning its effectiveness. But without it, organizations are deprived of the feedback system needed between management and staff.  Sure, you can abandon performance reviews, but before you do that, check with your lawyers to see if it’s a good idea.  They will probably suggest that it is not.

Clearly, performance management is broken.  Let’s explore why it’s broken and look at some ways to fix it.

The Failure of Cascading Objectives

In classic performance management, the broader company objectives provide the framework which is cascaded into the different departments and then finally delivered as individual objectives to staff. While this may certainly sound like a logical approach, many find the entire process confusing, subjective, and frustrating.

One of the biggest issues with the cascading objectives approach is that it is a one-sided conversation. Many employees, especially at the lower levels, find it difficult to understand the goals set out for them by management with respect to their actual roles. Since the approach does not allow the goals of the staff to be centered around their jobs, there is often a disconnect between what the employee is hired to do in the first place versus what they are asked to accomplish by the end of the year.

Another issue with the cascading objectives approach is that the process does not allow for much flexibility. Strategic goals established by management at the beginning of the year can easily change after some time. But classic performance management tools can be difficult to use, and executives are often reluctant to update their goals and go through the entire process again.

Finally, because managing cascading objectives is so time-consuming, running the exercise always requires extensive monitoring by HR. The problem with this top-down approach is t takes too much time.  By the time the process reaches lower-level staff, the allotted timeframe for the entire exercise has already passed.

With these challenges, it is easy to see why many organizations have chosen to give up on performance management entirely. But before you throw in the towel, shouldn’t you consider some alternatives? 

What if we tell you that there is a better approach? One that brings the entire performance management exercise back to what it was originally meant to measure – results.  Introducing Community™ Performance from Birches Group.

Why Do You Need Performance Management, Anyway?

Community™ Performance

In our article about pay for performance, we highlighted the key differences between recognizing employee growth in their job and rewarding employee achievement. The former is focused on measuring the accumulation of skills and knowledge in staff as they become more expert in their job roles.  This growth should be recognized through pay movement.  Employee achievements, on the other hand, should be measured and rewarded with one-time recognition through bonuses or other, similar tools.

Like the performance of the stock market, past achievement does not guarantee future achievement.  Therefore, performance should not be the basis for salary movement. Instead, achievements attained during the performance year should be celebrated and rewarded relative to that year.

Linking Performance to Purpose

One of the most glaring flaws of classic performance management is that it sets goals for staff that are often irrelevant to their jobs. Birches Group’s Community approach to performance management centers its expectations on performance to the actual definition of the job level. While specific initiatives set for each job may change year after year, the purpose of the job level remains the same.

Going back to Community’s approach that jobs at every grade level can be evaluated using only three factors – Purpose, Engagement, and Delivery – the same can be used to measure performance by simply asking three questions:

  • Purpose – Does the employee have good ideas?
  • Engagement – Did they listen and adapt to customer feedback?
  • Delivery – Did they deliver on time with high levels of quality?

Using an approach that measures achievement by linking it back to the job evaluation factors, this provides organizations a performance management system that is standardized, simplified, and can easily align with objectives across different grade levels and teams.

When the focus of measuring achievement becomes purpose-driven, employees will better understand how their objectives contribute to the overall mission of the organization, resulting to a more engaged and motivated workforce. Equally, this can allow employees the responsibility for setting their own initiatives in a way that contributes to the organization’s strategic priorities giving them ownership of their own performance.

Focusing on the Good

In traditional performance management, only the achievements of high performers are celebrated often causing the rest of the staff to feel demotivated and ignored. Because it uses a five-level rating system, many see the Achieve rating as inadequate. But the fact is most staff in an organization are reliable and satisfactory performers – those that deliver what is expected of them in a performance year. If most of the staff were able to carry out their jobs effectively by the end of the year, why only reward the achievements of an exceptional few?

Through Community Performance, we believe that achievement should be connected to reliable and satisfactory performance – celebrating the many good performers that are able to Achieve their primary purpose. Instead of a five-level rating system, we have developed a four-level rating system where there is only one level above Achieving the primary purpose of the job. This way, outstanding accomplishments achieved by an exceptionally few high performers during the year can be rated accordingly, but still allowing majority of staff to be rewarded.

360° Performance

Classic performance management applies a top-down approach where only the direct supervisor provides feedback on an employee’s performance. While it is the supervisor that would be familiar with the work of their staff, allowing for only one perspective can create room for partiality.

Additionally, the standards used in classic performance management has not always been clearly defined, making it possible to have differing interpretations among supervisors leading to inconsistent ratings despite similar levels of performance among some of the employees.

Our Community performance management approach allows for multi-rater perspectives. By applying our 360° feedback from the supervisor, peers, and external clients, this gives depth to the assessment and allows for a more holistic and objective outlook of one’s performance.

Traditional performance management has left many organizations confused and frustrated. But measuring performance remains essential to good workforce management. It provides an opportunity to link everyone’s contribution to the success of the organization. Rather than giving up on performance management, Birches Group is here to help your organization provide structure and clarity. Contact us to learn more.

Bianca manages our Marketing Team in Manila. She crafts messaging around Community™ concepts and develops promotional campaigns answering why Community™ should be each organization’s preferred solution, focusing on its simplicity and integrated approach. She has held various roles within Birches Group since 2009, starting as a Compensation Analyst and worked her way to Compensation Team Lead, and Training Program Services Manager. In addition to her current role in marketing and communications, she represents Birches Group in international HR conferences with private sector audiences.

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE – HR’S BIGGEST EPIC FAIL

Written by Bianca Valencia on . Posted in Resources.

Recognizing and rewarding employees for their contributions is required to motivate and retain staff. But “Pay for Performance” as we know it just doesn’t work!

For the longest time, companies have used performance ratings to decide merit pay increases and sometimes, annual incentives. Typically, merit increases are determined according to a combination of performance ratings and position in range (compa-ratio) – those with a combination of higher performance ratings and lower compa-ratios are eligible for higher increases, while those with lower ratings and higher compa-ratios get less.  The idea is that such an approach provides a differentiated reward to those with better performance, while ensuring that, on average, the company is paying at the market rate (compa-ratio of 100).

The level of differentiation between strong performers and good ones isn’t much with annual salary budgets of 3% or less in many countries.  Employees don’t get excited about getting an increase of 3.2% instead of 2.9%.  It’s not really motivating, and does little for retention, which are the two primary goals.  Not to mention employees and managers probably hate your performance management system and do not trust the results are fair.

What’s Wrong with Pay for Performance?

Putting aside that last thought, and assuming your performance management approach is working well and is perceived by management and staff to be fair and effective, the problem with pay for performance is one of alignment.  Pay for performance rewards a one-time achievement (as measured by the annual performance rating) with a salary increase forever. That’s a huge misalignment!

Merit increases are essentially “baked in” and will remain a part of salary until the employee leaves the organization.  On the other hand, performance is variable, and usually changes from year to year.  If an employee is a high performer one year, and gets a “high” merit increase, and then in the next year, their performance is lower, how much do they give back?  Yeah, right.  The penalty for lower performance is a smaller increase going forward.

Using annual performance assessment to determine salary increases is crazy.

Alignment is Key

To align your pay for performance strategy, the first thing you need to change is the role performance management plays in determining rewards.  Birches Group believes performance management, which measures periodic, time-bound achievements, should be used to grant one-time recognition such as bonuses.  When performance is higher, bonuses go up.  If performance drops, bonuses go down, sometimes to zero.  You should do something else for salary movement.  But what?

Using Skills to Recognize Growth

In Birches Group, we believe that pay movement should reflect one’s experience. As an employee gains more experience in their job over time, they develop a deeper understanding of their role and accumulate the necessary skills that enable them to be more efficient and produce results of increasing quality. Linking an employee’s growth in skills and knowledge to the determination of their salary movement makes sense, and it’s totally aligned.  The accumulation of skills and knowledge stays with your employees and can be applied continuously in the future.  Skills are like an annuity that keeps paying over and over – like salary!   The challenge with such an approach has always been how to measure skills and knowledge.  Until now.

Birches Group Community™ Skills provides a framework for measuring experience.  Skills uses five skill levels – Basic, Proficient, Skilled, Advanced, Expert – anchored to our job levels.  For each job level, explicit measures or milestones are defined, enabling managers to evaluate employees’ accumulated skills and knowledge.  Companies can link their compensation administration to the progression of Skills in any number of ways, and provide increases based on employee growth in their jobs rather than performance.

The New Pay for Performance

Employee’s should be recognized for both the growth they demonstrate in their job and their achievement during a performance period.  By structuring your pay for performance philosophy using two concepts instead of just one, you can solve the alignment issue and create a pay for performance program that works.

If an organization’s goal is to motivate and engage their staff, the approach must be clear and fair. By linking salary movement to growth in skills and knowledge, you will be paying for increased capacity, while also recognizing achievement. Contact us to learn more about our Community™ approach to recognition and reward.

Bianca manages our Marketing Team in Manila. She crafts messaging around Community™ concepts and develops promotional campaigns answering why Community™ should be each organization’s preferred solution, focusing on its simplicity and integrated approach. She has held various roles within Birches Group since 2009, starting as a Compensation Analyst and worked her way to Compensation Team Lead, and Training Program Services Manager. In addition to her current role in marketing and communications, she represents Birches Group in international HR conferences with private sector audiences.

WHY JOBS, NOT OBJECTIVES, MATTER WHEN MEASURING PERFORMANCE

Written by Bianca Valencia on . Posted in Resources.

There is a lot being written about these days about the ineffectiveness of performance management.  Some writers suggest that we just give up, throw in the towel and get rid of performance appraisals entirely.  Others claim to have a better way.  Many focus on the fact that performance discussions and feedback are actually more useful and more critical than the appraisal itself.

Of course, we also all know that even though appraisals can be difficult or tedious, they are necessary.  All people need to know how they are doing, and they need to know this in a qualitative manner measured against well-understood, objective standards.  Staff usually put great effort into their work.  They need to know how their employer values this effort.  To paraphrase New York’s famous ex-mayor, the late Ed Koch, they need to know “how they’re doing.”

The reason performance management is such a mess is because we are assessing the wrong things!  We have made it into a pseudo-science, artificially dense and hopelessly complex.

In classic performance management, the employee develops a set of objectives, often aligned with corporate initiatives that are set at the top of the organization and cascaded down to all levels.  Through these cascading objectives, employees focus on the critical activities which management believes will deliver the business results desired during that year. This approach fails to recognize that work is dynamic.  Objectives change, become superseded, and new priorities emerge.  Using cascading objectives for work planning has value, but as part of performance management it is highly flawed.

So how can the employee get a fair and useful evaluation?  In many organizations, there will be some negotiation to remove unmet objectives and to substitute with tasks that actually got done.  Companies spend inordinate amounts of time “calibrating” ratings in an attempt to promote some uniformity which in the end further undermines transparency and management accountability.

So what is the alternative?

Assess Performance Based on the Job

We think performance can be effectively measured by considering the job instead of the cascading objectives.  Think about it.  The context of the job defines expectations.  These expectations remain constant through various operational challenges and changing priorities.  You always expect your finance officer to ensure integrity in managing financial transactions.  You always expect your brand manager to be seeking opportunities to promote your products and bring you market insights.  These expectations have been designed into the job role.  In each and every interaction, staff are judged against three simple measures:

  • Does this individual know what they are talking about?
  • Is this person listening to me and understanding my needs?
  • Can I count on this person to deliver to my expectations?

From the lowest position in the company through senior management, each and every day we are individually judged against these three basic parameters, which are informed by the job roles we encumber.

Here is a simple example:

Remember the last time you ate at a restaurant?  There was a server who took your order, brought your food and looked after you from the moment you were seated until you finished your meal.  You have no idea what objectives were agreed upon between the server and his or her manager.  But I bet you have a very good idea of the server’s performance for your meal!

For example:

  • Were you greeting politely when seated?
  • Were the daily specials explained and were all of your questions about the menu choices answered efficiently and effectively?
  • Was you meal well-prepared and delivered promptly?

You get the idea. You can easily answer the above questions about your server at a restaurant.  And if the answers were all yes, I think you’d agree that the server’s performance was excellent (be sure to leave a nice tip!).

We’ve assessed performance in this example based on our expectations of the job – the things good servers in restaurants are expected to do .  Objectives are not needed because we know how to assess performance based on our expectations of performance for the job.

Performance can be measured against three factors – Purpose, Engagement and Delivery.

Think about our restaurant server again.  The purpose of the job is to take your order, serve your food and maintain a high level of satisfaction through excellent customer service.  For engagement, the server must communicate effectively with each customer, as well as the kitchen, busboys, and other restaurant staff, to ensure that everything goes well for your meal.  Delivery is probably the easiest to understand – was the order delivered on a timely basis, accurately and in a way that makes the dining experience a pleasure for the customer?

The Birches Group Solution

At Birches Group, we’ve built our Community™ suite of applications around the three core factors of job evaluation – Purpose, Engagement and Delivery – mentioned above.  Our Community™ Performance Management (PM) module uses the underlying job levels to create a consistent, graduated scale on which to rate performance based on the expectations of the job, rather than the completion of specific objectives.  It’s a 360° approach which includes self-evaluation, manager assessment and feedback from peers and customers (internal and/or external to the organization).

The best part about Community™ PM is its simplicity.  It is easy to use and takes just a few minutes to complete a review, but provides both employees and managers with robust feedback suitable for a meaningful performance discussion.

Let’s not give up so fast on performance appraisals.  Instead, let’s try managing them differently.

We have — and it works!  Contact us to learn more.

Warren joined Birches Group in New York as a partner in 2007, following a long career in Compensation and Benefits at Colgate-Palmolive. He held the position of Director, International Compensation for 10 years immediately prior to joining Birches Group. Warren has broad experience working across the globe with clients on local national and expatriate compensation projects. He leads our Business Development and Client Services teams and manages our strategic partnerships around the world. Warren previously held leadership positions for the Expatriate Management Committee of the National Foreign Trade Council and was president of the Latin America Compensation and Benefits Forum.